Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-31386.v3

ABSTRACT

Background: and objective: Little is yet known whether pathogenesis of COVID-19 is different between young and elder patients. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and provide predictors of mortality for young adults with severe COVID-19. Methods: : A total of 77 young adults with confirmed severe COVID-19 were recruited retrospectively at Tongji Hospital. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, treatment and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. The prognostic effects of variables were analyzed using logistic regression model. Results: : In this retrospective cohort, non-survivors showed higher incidence of dyspnea and co-existing laboratory abnormalities, compared with young survivals in severe COVID-19. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lymphopenia, elevated level of d-dimer, hypersensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-CTnI) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were independent predictors of mortality in young adults with severe COVID-19. Further analysis showed that severely young adults with two or more factors abnormalities above would be more prone to death. The similar predictive effect of above four factors had been observed in all-age patients with severe COVID-19. Conclusion: Lymphopenia, elevated level of d-dimer, hs-CTnI and hs-CRP predicted clinical outcomes of young adults with severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea , Factor X Deficiency , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Laboratory Infection , COVID-19 , Lymphopenia
2.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-55457.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Current information is not enough to recognize the risk factors of clinical deterioration and to make medical decisions in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed, with collecting data from medical records of COVID-19 patients in three designated hospitals from January 8, 2020 to May 6, 2020. Clinical data were analyzed between the deteriorated and the non-deteriorated patients, which was defined as either a increase of 2 categories on the modified 6-category ordinal scale, or a decline of PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio more than 100mmHg. Results: Total 238 patients with COVID-19 were selected, where 31 were deteriorated and 207 were non-deteriorated. In the deterioration group, the case fatality rate was up to 41.9%. Compared with non-deteriorated patients, the deteriorated were older (65.8[IQR 54.3-72.3] vs 54.4[41.0-66.1], p=0.004) and were more likely to have chronic medical illnesses (17[54.8%]) vs 92[44.4%]). Multivariable regression showed that three variables, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)≥3.66 (OR, 9.85; 95% CI, 1.68-57.57), hyponatremia (OR, 8.35; 95% CI, 1.74-40.16), and presence of ground-glass opacities with consolidation (OR, 5.84; 95% CI, 1.24-27.49) were associated with increased odds of clinical deterioration. The variable that inspiring air or traditional oxygen therapy only within 72 hours after admission, indicated a decreased odd of illness progression (OR, 0.075; 95% CI, 0.012–0.465).Conclusions: COVID-19 patients with clinical deterioration had more common extra-pulmonary organ impair in early stage and high case fatality rate. Three factors, NLR ≥3.66, hyponatremia and presence of ground-glass opacities with consolidation were determined as high risk factors in deterioration. 


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hyponatremia
3.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-27267.v1

ABSTRACT

Background:COVID-19 causes epidemics and pandemics worldwide, but the role of pathophysiological parameters particularly systemic inflammation in COVID-19 has not been understood. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in view of systemic inflammation in COVID-19.Methods:In this retrospective study, the demographic and clinical data of 225 confirmed COVID-19 cases on admission at Tongji Hospital from January 28 to February 15, 2020, were extracted and analyzed. These patients were categorized by inflammation state on the basis of the expression of inflammatory factors or classified as severe and non-severe according to 2019 American Thoracic Society / Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines.Results: Among 225 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 155 patients (68.9%) categorized into hyperinflammation group and 70 (31.1%) were non- hyperinflammation group. Compared to non-hyperinflammation group, hyperinflammation group more frequently had chest tightness/dyspnea and lymphopenia, aberrant multiple indexes of organ function including the heart, liver, kidney, and coagulation, with higher level of C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as well as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), etc. Hyperinflammation group were more likely to admit to intensive care unit (ICU) (52.3% vs 5.7%), receive ventilation (84.5% vs 10.0%) and be with higher mortality (44.5% vs 5.7%) than non-hyperinflammation group. The mortality of severe patients with hyperinflammation (60/99, 60.6%) was significantly higher than without hyperinflammation (2/20, 10.0%). Non-severe patients with hyperinflammation even tended to have higher mortality (9/56, 16.1%) than those in severe cases without hyperinflammation (2/20, 10%).Conclusion: Excessive systemic inflammation was correlated highly with poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19, particularly in severe cases. Non-severe patients with hyperinflammation even tended to have higher mortality than those in severe cases without hyperinflammation.Trial registration: This is a retrospective observational study without a trial registration number.


Subject(s)
Necrosis , COVID-19 , Inflammation , Lymphopenia
4.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-26761.v1

ABSTRACT

Background Since December 2019, COVID-19 has emerged in Wuhan, China and spread globally. As of now, there is still no explicit therapeutic regimen and the use of corticosteroid is also controversial. We aimed to explore the effectiveness of corticosteroid and provide evidence for the rational use of corticosteroid in different patients with COVID-19.Methods In this multi-centered, retrospective study, we extracted the clinical data of 649 cases with COVID-19 with definite outcome (discharged or dead) from 14 hospitals in Hubei province, and evaluated the clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and their association with outcomes.Results Ninety-five of 649 patients had died. Older male patients with comorbidities had an increased risk of death and more obvious abnormalities in clinical indicators. Corticosteroid, γ-globulin treatment and invasive ventilation were more frequently used in non-survivors. Survivors with corticosteroid treatment had a prolonged hospitalization. The median time duration for temperature restore for non-survivors after corticosteroid treatment was longer than that of both survivors. The lymphocyte count on admission was lower in the patients treated with corticosteroids compared to those without corticosteroid treatment. Lymphocyte count recovered significantly after corticosteroid treatment in survivors, but not in non-survivors.Conclusions The responses to corticosteroid treatment were different in COVID-19 patients with different outcomes. The surviving patients with relatively lower lymphocyte count were more likely to be given corticosteroids. For non-survivors, the lymphocyte count was too low and the effect of corticosteroids was poor. Survivors under corticosteroid treatment had a prolonged hospitalization, but had a recovery of lymphocytes. The recovery of lymphocyte count and temperature after corticosteroid treatment may be used as predictors of prognosis of patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Abnormalities , Death
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL